DocketXDocketX / Glossary / attractive nuisance
Attractive Nuisance
An attractive nuisance is a dangerous condition on property that is likely to lure children, and the property owner may be held responsible if a child is injured.
What it actually is
This legal doctrine appears in premises liability cases involving child trespassers. It modifies the usual rule that landowners owe no duty to trespassers, instead imposing a duty to protect children from artificial hazards that are both dangerous and enticing. The property owner must have known or should have known that children would be attracted to the condition and that it posed a foreseeable risk of serious harm.
Why it matters in your case
If you are a property owner facing a lawsuit, this doctrine can make you liable for a child's injury even if the child was trespassing. The plaintiff must prove the condition was artificial, unusually dangerous, and that you failed to take reasonable steps to prevent access or warn of the danger.
The common misunderstanding
Many people mistakenly believe that any attractive feature, like a swimming pool or trampoline, automatically creates liability. In reality, the doctrine requires the condition to be both highly dangerous and one that the owner should have anticipated children would encounter without adequate safeguards.
Get the actual rule
Definitions are orientation; rules are authority
This page explains the concept. When it matters to your case, read the rule that governs it in your court — we hold Texas, federal and Washington court rules word for word, and every state's official resources are on the state pages. If someone cites a case at you, check that it exists first.
Related
Terms that travel with this one
General explanation, not legal advice, and not specific to any state — procedures and deadlines vary by jurisdiction and court. If you can get a lawyer or free legal aid, do: every real option.