DocketX / Glossary / special verdict
A special verdict is when the jury answers a list of specific factual questions, and the judge then uses those answers to decide who wins the case.
In a special verdict, the jury does not announce a winner or loser; instead, it returns written findings on disputed facts, such as whether a driver ran a red light or whether a contract was signed. This procedure typically occurs after the judge gives the jury a set of written questions (called interrogatories) to answer. The judge then applies the law to those factual findings to enter a final judgment.
A special verdict can prevent the jury from ignoring the law or being swayed by sympathy, because the jury only decides facts, not the legal outcome. It also makes appeals clearer, since an appellate court can see exactly which facts the jury found, separate from the judge's legal rulings.
Many people mistakenly think a special verdict means the jury decides the case in a special or unusual way. In reality, it is a standard procedural tool that shifts the final legal decision from the jury to the judge.
Get the actual rule
This page explains the concept. When it matters to your case, read the rule that governs it in your court — we hold Texas, federal and Washington court rules word for word, and every state's official resources are on the state pages. If someone cites a case at you, check that it exists first.
Related
General explanation, not legal advice, and not specific to any state — procedures and deadlines vary by jurisdiction and court. If you can get a lawyer or free legal aid, do: every real option.